Translate this page from English into :

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Forget Oil, the New Bubble Burst is Agriculture


Today, July 29, agriculture futures traded mostly lower as a warm, dry weather pattern settled into the Midwest, boosting crops heading into the important fall harvest. But as shown on the table below, corn futures rose 12.25 cents to settle at $6.135 a bushel on the CBOT.


A rush to cash in on ethanol has slowed as soaring corn prices squeeze profit margins for producers of the alternative fuel. At a recent high of $7 per bushel, the corn used to make ethanol has tripled in price since many plants were built two years ago, and some facilities have been shut down or put on hold.

Chris Hurt, a professor of agricultural economics in the heart of the Corn Belt at Indiana's Purdue University, on July 15, said, “Corn is now more expensive than it was when many of the ethanol plants were built. Two years ago, when many of the plants were being built, corn was $2 per bushel, making ethanol production so profitable, that in some cases a plant could be paid off in just 6 months”.

Since mid-2007, U.S. corn prices have increased as domestic feedgrain supply prospects have caught up with demand. As a result, ethanol production gross profit margins were reduced in the later part of 2007 to the degree that almost no new ethanol plants were announced or planned in the U.S. Actually, ethanol plants on the drawing boards were cancelled before construction could begin, and work was halted on a few plants that were already under construction.

Now, operating ethanol plants are feeling the pain of declining profitability if not outright losses. The charts below shows corn ethanol profit margin.

Source: Daniel O’Brien and Mike Woolverton, Extension Agricultural Economist, K-State Research and Extension

The Washington Times reported on July 17, that high corn prices are threatening the U.S. ethanol industry’s ability to reduce the country’s foreign oil independence. Analysts are predicting that corn prices will stay high through next year even though the number of crops planted has drastically increased.

Beside due to Midwest flood, raising corn prices is also driven by higher fertilizer prices. According to State Agriculture Secretary Roger L on http://www.cattlenetwork.com, he said the cost of growing an acre of corn had increased by about 30 percent this year, due primarily to higher diesel fuel, land rental and fertilizer prices. A ton of potash fertilizer that cost about $600 last year rose to about $1,000 this year.

When all costs are included, it cost about $500 to plant an acre of corn this year, up from about $280 last year. Things don't always turn out the way farmers expect, state farmers changing their minds since March and planting less corn. Their decision can be influenced by weather. In March, Maryland farmers announced plans to plant 490,000 acres of corn this year. That would have been a decline of 9.26 percent from the 2007 planting, the largest in 15 years.

Even Brazilian sugarcane based ethanol is not excluded from squeezing profit margin. According to Forbes on July 7, Brazilian sugar and ethanol producers' profitability has been hit not only by a surge in production costs such as the price of fertilizer which has doubled in the past year but also a strong appreciation of the local currency against the dollar.


Costs to produce anhydrous ethanol, which in Brazil is made from sugar cane, rose 20 percent in reais from February 2007 through April 2008, according to Datagro analysts, who forecasts a new increase until July. "The real problem is not the price, but costs and the currency exchange," said Luiz Guilherme Zancaner, president of Unialco sugar and ethanol group. He said fertilizer prices rose 64 percent from a year ago. Rising fertilizer and diesel prices, and growing labor costs hit mills' results hard in the past year or so, Antonio de Padua Rodrigues, technical director at the Sugar Cane Industry Association, said.

According to BusinessWire on June 2006, A Comprehensive research report on the American corn ethanol industry written by Russell Hasan on 2006, entitled “A Research Report on Ethanol Investment: Golden Opportunity or Fool's Gold?”, cautions investors about the danger of the ethanol bubble bursting in the short term, but reaches the conclusion that there are long-term opportunities for intelligent ethanol investors.

The report reaches the following conclusions:
  1. The ethanol boom has been engineered by mandatory usage requirements, high tax incentives and prohibitive import tariffs. The domestic corn ethanol industry will have trouble in a free market economy.
  2. Domestic corn ethanol production capacity will surpass mandated consumption levels soon, bringing about pressure on price.
  3. Like the first ethanol boom and bust of the Carter era, this boom is also vulnerable to fickle political will. This is dangerous because profit margins will shrink if government incentives are removed.
  4. Ethanol is more expensive and gets less mileage than gasoline. Consumer acceptance of E85 is suspect.
  5. Brazilian sugarcane ethanol is considerably cheaper and more efficient than corn ethanol. Reprocessed Brazilian sugarcane ethanol can enter America from Caribbean and CAFTA countries without paying the tariff.
  6. There is simply not enough corn to make large-scale corn ethanol viable, a claim that former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan agreed with recently. Tight corn supply will put pressure on producers.
  7. Corn ethanol is likely to be replaced by cellulosic ethanol, which will be cheaper and cleaner than corn ethanol.
  8. Ethanol stocks follow oil prices. At the first sign of the softening of crude oil prices, institutional investors will bail out, leaving individual investors to take losses.
  9. Ethanol has reached tabloid stardom because of celebrity endorsements from Bill Gates, Ted Turner and Richard Branson. Celebrities have been offered advantageous investment terms that the average investor will not receive.
  10. The ethanol craze contains a lot of fool's gold, but there are still golden opportunities for investors who understand the industry.
An excerpt from the report follows:
    "It is our firmly held belief that the next great fortunes are going to be made in the alternative energy industry. Unfortunately, corn ethanol is not a simple opportunity of this kind, for the reasons described above. Although this industry may be profitable for the next five years, it is highly probable that the American corn ethanol industry, except possibly for small co-ops, will face strong pressure from corn supply concerns, sugarcane ethanol imports from Brazil, and new cellulosic ethanol technology in five to ten years. Competition from gasoline will be brutal if oil prices fall, and profit margins will suffer fatal blows if government incentives like the tariff are removed. Companies overwhelmed by these factors will probably cause the ethanol bubble to burst by the end of the decade. Hopefully, the major American ethanol producers will find ways to weather this storm, particularly by exploiting new cellulosic technologies or securing cheap corn supplies, in order to achieve long-term profitability."

Related Posts :
  1. Dennis Gartman Predicts Corn Ethanol Producers Bankruptcy
  2. Agrium(AGU) is Temporary Oversold
  3. World Food Shortage and the Ethanol Bubble
Please Note!
This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

Short Ideas Today, July 29, 2008

Tractor Supply Corp.(TSCO) is currently overbought and ready to be shorted for a short term trading. I expect it will be down to around 35.


The another is Energy South, Inc. (ENSI).


Related Posts :

Please Note!
This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

Wachovia Bank(WB) Needs to Raise $15 Billion in Capital


According to ClusterStock.com on July 28, Wachovia Bank(WB) may offload WB's securities division, which consists of A.G. Edwards and Evergreen Mutual funds. Other supposed targets for the axe are the bank's Northeast and Texas retail branches. Wachovia's capital management unit could fetch $10 billion to $15 billion, CreditSights Inc. analyst David Hendler said in a July 22 report, based on annualized earnings of about $1 billion.

While Steven Syre, A The Boston Globe's Columnist, on July 29, wrote:
    Banks in trouble need to raise money to get out of the jam. First they try to sell more shares of the company. If that fails, they unload assets or business units. Banks that really get desperate will sell anything that isn't nailed to the floor.

    A number of banks facing serious problems are said to be considering sales of their money management arms. But most, like Fifth Third Bancorp., KeyCorp, and National City Corp., own relatively small and undistinguished investment arms.

    Not so at Wachovia Corp. The troubled banking giant owns Evergreen Investments, the well-known Boston firm that manages $246 billion in mutual funds and other accounts. Wachovia also owns a big retail brokerage operation. Could they be on the block?

    This became a serious question last week, when Wachovia reported the worst loss in company history. New chief Bob Steel told analysts he would sell noncore assets to plug the hole. Steel never did say what he considered a core asset, but promised a review would be finished in months.

    Wachovia needs to raise some serious money. Even the company estimates it won't be able to collect on about $9 billion worth of adjustable rate mortgages it owns. The brokerage and Evergreen combined might fetch $10 billion to $15 billion, by one estimate.

    A Wachovia official told Bloomberg News that the brokerage was off the table. So what about Evergreen?

    An Evergreen official declined to comment, but pointed me to Steel's words during his conference call with analysts last week. Sure, he was prepared to chop off and sell noncore assets. But Steel also said: "We're strong and well positioned in so many parts of asset management, it just seems like a great business for us to continue to drive and grow."

    I'd call that inconclusive. But the answer will be clear within a few months.
The bank has reported a surprisingly large second-quarter loss as much as $8.86 billion, on July 22, was slashing its dividend and eliminating 10,750 positions after losses tied to mortgages soared.

Related Posts :
  1. Merril Lynch(MER) Takes A New $5.7 bn Pre-tax Write-Down in the Third Quarter
  2. Bank Collapse Update: $400 Billion of Writeoffs So Far, $600 Billion to Go (WM, WB, JPM, FNM, FRE)
  3. Bridgewater warns Bank losses from credit crisis may run to $1,600bn
Please Note!
This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

Merril Lynch(MER) Takes A New $5.7 bn Pre-tax Write-Down in the Third Quarter

Bloomberg wrote today:
    Merrill Lynch & Co., the third- biggest U.S. securities firm, will sell $8.5 billion of stock and liquidate $30.6 billion of bonds at a fifth of their face value to shore up credit ratings imperiled by mortgage losses.

    Losses on CDOs and the associated hedging contracts have accounted for about $27 billion of the total $41 billion of total writedowns taken by Merrill over the past year. The firm was one of the largest underwriters of CDOs before the credit crisis hit last year, and Merrill was stuck with more than $50 billion of them on its books when buyers fled the market.

    The remaining CDOs may be less worrisome to investors. About $7.2 billion of the $8.8 billion left are hedged with "highly rated counterparties", the firm said in the statement.
According to RTTNews, Merrill said it has agreed to sell $30.6 billion of U.S. super senior ABS CDOs to an affiliate of Lone Star Funds for $6.7 billion. At the end of the second quarter, the CDOs were carried at $11.1 billion. Merrill Lynch also said it plans to offer new stock to raise $8.5 billion. The underwriters will be granted option to buy an additional $1.3 billion of common stock to cover over-allotments. Common stock offerings are typically unpopular because they dilute current shareholders.

When Merrill earlier this month sold its 20 percent share of Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News, for $4.43 billion, an 11 percent discount to the $5 billion market value. Kathy Lien, A DailyFX.com's Analyst, suspected that Merrill will not sell a such this valuable asset if it doesn't need a new cash. Now, we know that Merrill have not disclosed another $5.7 bn writedown when it reported its earning on July 17 -- it's just twelve days ago. Suddenly, Merrill needs to raise another $8.5 cash by selling shares, now.

Regarding to Merrill's new writedown, Barry Ritholtz, from the Big Picture, was raising some questions:
  1. Why did Merrill fail to disclose this write-down to shareholders when they reported on July 17th? The stock was $30.73 then; everyone who bought since then just got totally sandbagged.
  2. The Financials traded today as if many people knew this was coming. How much non-public information leaked in advance of this announcement?
  3. Who really thinks the worst of the write-downs, share issuance, and dilution is behind us? Anyone? Bueller?
  4. Anyone think Financials are cheap? Think they might get cheaper?
  5. Who really thinks the Financials have put in a bottom?

Related Posts :
  1. Lehman and Merrill Lynch Default Risk Charts
  2. Bridgewater warns Bank losses from credit crisis may run to $1,600bn
  3. Lehman Lying, Its Crush, and David Einhorn’s Winning
Please Note!
This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share