Translate this page from English into :

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Did late October see the end of the bear market for commodity stocks?

From MoneyWeb
November 2, 2008 13:01

The following quote from Canaccord Capital's Chief Portfolio Strategist Nick Majendie:
"If we are close to a bottom, we believe it will be the quality blue chip stocks that will recover the fastest. Why? The answer is because when there is financial panic, investors sell the good with the bad. With all the recent de-leveraging by financial institutions and in particular hedge funds, the margin clerk has been king. Whatever could catch a bid was often sold so that even blue chip stocks have traded down to Depression-type valuations. Quality stocks with strong balance sheets, good and sustainable dividends and good long-term prospects should then be the first to recover."
How true this has been/is likely to be in the metals commodities sector as is highlighted in the various tabulations of stock price performance from my colleague Barry Sergeant. In times of market panic any liquid stock gets sold regardless of quality. Ironically non-liquid stocks where there is little buy or sell interest tend to perform best, but this represents such a tiny sector of the market as to be irrelevant.

Rod Blake also highlights in a weekly ‘blog' a most interesting observation from the Gartman Letter in that "Bear markets panics end in late October. Do not ask us why this is so; we note only that it is so. We note that panic, after panic, after panic has begun in September and has ended in October. More importantly than that, the last week of October has been the ending point for those panics. More importantly still, October 27th is the average ending date for so many of them in the past." This note was written on October 27th - and there has certainly been a major pick-up in world stock markets over the last few days of last month. Let's hope this observation proves true yet again.

But while markets in general may be picking up, metals commodity prices are still in serious trouble and the sector may continue to underperform until the fallout abates and analysts can truly assess how the supply/demand patterns are really panning out. Will the "China syndrome" continue almost unabated bar a brief hiccup, or will metals demand crash there too? No-one really seems to know and it is going to take a few months for the anomalies introduced into the markets by the financial panic to unwind and the true situation become clear.

In as much that stocks in general have probably been oversold, with the blue chips falling alongside the real dogs, then this is probably true of commodities also. After all latest serious estimates of global activity still point to an increase of 1.3 percent next year in global GDP. OK - well below levels seen of late, but growth nonetheless.

So what is the essence of the above. If the commentators quoted are correct, the markets bottomed last week and while we may not yet be in a real bull run, we could be out of the true bear phase. Better quality stocks have been oversold, and this applies to metals and minerals stocks as much as anything else, so there are some big bargains to be found out there.

Meanwhile the weak will continue to suffer as debt is well-nigh impossible to refinance if the tiniest degree of risk is apparent. As we noted here before, the fallout among the weaker mining juniors could be catastrophic - even if the market has now bottomed. Even the majors say they are conserving cash - note the latest reports from Barrick and Goldcorp - and this means future projects are going to be heavily delayed, or in some cases postponed indefinitely with a corresponding effect on projected medium and long term metals supplies. If the global economy keeps growing, even at a tiny rate, but metals supplies are likely to fall, then when the real picture is understood there could be a fast and dramatic rise in commodity prices - perhaps not back to the recent bubble-driven highs, but high enough to pull the mining sector out of the current gloom and doom scenario.

Related Posts :
  1. Dennis Gartman Letter: Suggests investing in gold
  2. Where oil prices are heading
  3. Commodities are in a secular bull market
  4. The gold price during recessions
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

Florida Rail Service To Run On Biodiesel

A Florida commuter rail service will move passengers
using biodiesel from palm and soy oil.


Tri-Rail, the commuter rail service connecting Miami with Fort Lauderdale and Palm Beach, announced this week that it was beginning to power most of its trains with biodiesel made from palm and soy oil, depending on the availability of each feedstock.

According to The Palm Beach Post, it is one of the first systems in the nation to do so.

Tri-Rail said the new fuel would cost no more than regular diesel because while it runs about 7 percent less efficiently it costs 10 to 30 cents less a gallon.

"We are about to transfer a trillion dollars out of this country," James Simpson, head of the Federal Transit Administration, was quoted as saying in The Post, "It’s going up in the smoke of diesel fuel, and it’s going to foreign countries".

Related Posts :
  1. George Soros: investing in green energy could save global economy
  2. George Soros: energy investments will fuel America’s next boom
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

Germany plans $64 billion stimulus package

The German government plans a two-year program of investments and incentives to provide a 50 billion- euro ($64-billion) boost to the economy, wracked by a freeze in global credit markets.

``Measures to safeguard companies' financing and liquidity are provided by funding investments worth slightly more than 20 billion euros,'' according to a joint paper by the economy and finance ministries obtained by Bloomberg News. They ``will encourage investments and orders by companies, private households and municipalities totaling about 50 billion euros.''

Chancellor Angela Merkel said yesterday the government will enact ``broad'' measures to bolster the economy. The government has so far been divided on whether to offer tax cuts or boost spending and the Cabinet will discuss the package on Nov. 5. Germany last month slashed its growth forecast for 2009 to 0.2 percent, compared with a 1.7 percent estimate for this year.

The paper, dated Oct. 31, suggests the government is seeking to fund measures with increased borrowing and ``accept cyclical revenue shortfalls or higher expenditures to the full extent.'' The government will fail to meet its target of balancing the federal budget by 2011 because of the ``changed economic environment,'' the document said.

Related Posts :
  1. Nobel Winner: Bernanke, Paulson Steps 'Not Smart'
  2. Japan announced a 27 trillion yen ($275 billion) stimulus package
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

Nobel Winner: Bernanke, Paulson Steps 'Not Smart'

From Bloomberg:
    Robert J. Aumann, the Israeli economist who won the 2005 Nobel Prize in economics, said the steps taken by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to save financial markets "weren't smart".

    "The intervention by the regulators to save the U.S. economy will lead to further bankruptcies of banks and insurance companies," Aumann said at a rabbinical conference in Jerusalem yesterday. "They are only encouraging institutions to take more uncalculated risks".

    The crisis in the financial markets was caused by the incentives provided to managers of banks and other financial institutions that caused them to act to their own benefit and not the banks', he said. Bonuses were given on the basis of loan sales, without considering who the borrowers were, he said.

    More than 100 of the world's biggest banks and securities firms have posted about $685.4 billion in asset writedowns and credit losses because of the financial turmoil. A month ago, Congress approved a $700 billion rescue package that gave the Treasury wide authority to buy and guarantee assets to prevent a U.S. financial collapse.

    Aumann, who won the Nobel Prize for his work on game theory, said there is "no financial crisis" in Israel. The Israeli government's decision not to intervene in the financial markets was correct, he said.
The Gentle Readers may compare the statement above and George Soros' statement below:
    The U.S. authorities bought into market fundamentalist ideology. They thought that the markets would ultimately correct themselves. U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson epitomized this. He thought that six months after the Bear Stearns crisis the market would have adjusted and, "Well, if Lehman (Brothers) goes bust, the system can take it." Instead, everything fell apart.

    Since they did not understand the nature of the problem -- that the market would not correct itself -- they did not see the need for government intervention. They did not prepare a Plan B.

    As the shock of the Lehman failure set in, he had to change his mind and rescue AIG. The next day there was a run on the money markets and commercial paper markets, so he turned around again and said we need a $700 billion bailout. But he wanted to put the money in the wrong place -- taking the toxic securities out of the hands of the banks.

    They have finally now come around -- with the government buying equity in banks -- because they see the financial system is on the verge of collapse. - October 12, 2008 (George Soros: End of Financial Crisis could be in Sight)
What is your conclusion? Does US gov see the real problems in the current crisis?

Related Posts :
  1. George Soros: crisis underscores need for regulation
  2. George Soros: End of Financial Crisis could be in Sight
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

George Soros: crisis underscores need for regulation


International financier and philanthropist George Soros,
had a conversation with Ford International Professor of Economics
and Head of MIT Department of Economics Ricardo J. Cabellero
at Kresge Auditorium - MIT, 48 Massachusetts Avenue,
on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 3:30 pm


Stephanie Schorow, News Office Correspondent
October 29, 2008

Financier, philanthropist and political activist George Soros told an MIT audience Tuesday that the current financial crisis underscored the need for regulation, even while he warned of the pitfalls of regulation and insisted on the impossibility of predicting the economic future.

"The prevailing perception of the market actually affects the so-called fundamentals that market prices are supposed to impact," Soros said during a wide-ranging conversation moderated by Ricardo Caballero, the Ford International Professor of Economics and head of the Department of Economics. "That is the nature of financial systems. Bubbles are a particular manifestation of this."

Because financial markets are not a "natural" but a "human" phenomenon, "the idea that you should be able to predict the future is nonsense," he told a packed audience in Kresge Auditorium.

"I don't get the market right," admitted Soros, later adding, "The reason I do well is I learn from my mistakes."

Soros said the recent meltdown of global financial markets -- something the former hedge fund manager described in dire terms -- undercut the pervasive belief that markets could be entirely self-regulating. That misconception arose, ironically, from the resolution of past financial crises with regulatory interventions: "These periodic financial crises served as successful tests of the misconception of market fundamentals," he said.

The burst of the housing bubble in the United States was, Soros said, a relatively small event but it was a "detonator that set off a much bigger explosion. And that super bubble has been growing for at least 25 years."

Soros, whose new book is titled "The New Paradigm for Financial Markets," criticized former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan for keeping interest rates "too low for too long" and, more fundamentally, for holding fast to the idea that it was better to "pick up the pieces" rather than impose regulations on the market.

Caballero also asked the question that was on the mind of many in the audience: "How do we fix the system?"

Certainly, financial markets will always undergo bubbles and bursts, but "unless the United States leads an international effort to stabilize the system, the system will not continue," Soros asserted.

However, while, "I argue that the ideology that markets are perfect is wrong, regulations are also imperfect, in fact they are more imperfect than the market … you don't want to regulate more than you have to. But I think you have to regulate credit as well as money."

During an audience question and answer session, Soros was questioned about his financial past as well as his analysis. MIT Sloan School of Management student Gary Cao asked Soros about his role during "Black Wednesday" in 1992, when the financier made $1 billion as the British pound collapsed.

"I played by the rules. I was a key member of the market. I was doing what other people in the market were doing, with no negative moral implications," Soros replied. "At the time, as a citizen, I was concerned about making the rules better. And I'm still concerned."

Another questioner noted that Soros had written previous books predicting economic doom. Yes, Soros said amid laughter, he made such predictions in 1987 and 1997 and "the third time the wolf came."

In response to a question about the impact of the financial crises on nascent democracies in volatile areas of the world, Soros sounded a hopeful note, saying that the United States could play a positive role but "for that we have to change fundamentally what we stand for and recognize that … we have an obligation to the world which we have absolutely abandoned."

Yet Soros also said that the United States would cease to be the world's undisputed dominant force. "The veto power that we have in the International Monetary Fund will disappear. We will be downsized. At the same time, hopefully, we will have a better working system and opponents will be more downsized than we will."

Related Posts :
  1. George Soros: investing in green energy could save global economy
  2. An interview given by George Soros to the Finnish Broadcasting Company (YLE)
  3. George Soros: energy investments will fuel America’s next boom
  4. George Soros: End of Financial Crisis could be in Sight
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

George Soros: investing in green energy could save global economy

From Green Inc Blog
George Soros on the Clean-Energy Economy
October 14, 2008

Friday, October 10, 2008 - In an interview with Bill Moyers on PBS, George Soros, who has made billions of dollars based on his ability to read the ebb and flow of markets, suggested that investing in alternative energy technologies, refurbishing aging electricity grids and pursuing household energy efficiency, among other green strategies, could yet save the global economy.

Mr. Soros told Moyers that the business of green could serve as the new "motor of the world economy" -- echoing a refrain he has used before.

The relevant video clip follows, with transcript to be found after the jump.



Excerpt transcript:
BILL MOYERS: So let’s think about those people down at Neely’s Barbecue going home tonight having heard you. What they’ve heard you say is the system is really disfunctioning right now. It’s out of control. Nobody’s in charge. They’ve heard you express your own worry that in the next three months it could get much, much worse.

And they’ve heard you say that you don’t see much good news immediately on the horizon. So let’s leave them something to think about as they go home. Let them go home and say, “Mr. Soros said here are three things we can do, simply.” One?

GEORGE SOROS: Well, deal with the mortgage problem. Reduce foreclosures. Recapitalize the banks. And then work on a better world order where we work together to resolve problems that confront humanity like global warming. And I think that dealing with global warming will require a lot of investment.

You see, for the last 25 years the world economy, the motor of the world economy that has been driving it was consumption by the American consumer who has been spending more than he has been saving, all right? Than he’s been producing. So that motor is now switched off. It’s finished. It’s run out of — can’t continue. You need a new motor. And we have a big problem. Global warming. It requires big investment. And that could be the motor of the world economy in the years to come.

BILL MOYERS: Putting more money in, building infrastructure, converting to green technology.

GEORGE SOROS: Instead of consuming, building an electricity grid, saving on energy, rewiring the houses, adjusting your lifestyle where energy has got to cost more until it you introduce those new things. So it will be painful. But at least we will survive and not cook.

BILL MOYERS: You’re talking about this being the end of an era and needing to create a whole new paradigm for the economic model of the country, of the world, right?

GEORGE SOROS: Yes.

On Sunday, Mr. Soros blasted leaders of the United States and Europe for being “consistently behind the curve” in dealing with the global financial crisis.

“This is the crisis of my lifetime,” Mr. Soros told The Associated Press during the weekend meeting of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. “I haven’t seen anything like it and I won’t see anything like it again.”

It is also worth noting that despite his sanguine disposition toward clean-energy development, Mr. Soros has drawn jeers from green advocates — principally for his investments in sugar cane production (destined to become ethanol) in Brazil, which critics say is mowing down forests at an unprecedented pace.

Wrote The Washington Post last year:

“Deforestation in the Cerrado is actually happening at a higher rate than it has in the Amazon,” said John Buchanan, senior director of business practices for Conservation International in Arlington. “If the actual deforestation rates continue, all the remaining vegetation in the Cerrado could be lost by the year 2030. That would be a huge loss of biodiversity.”

The roots of this transformation lie in the worldwide demand for ethanol, recently boosted by a U.S. Senate bill that would mandate the use of 36 billion gallons of ethanol by 2022, more than six times the capacity of the United States’ 115 ethanol refineries. President Bush, who proposed a similar increase in his State of the Union address, visited Brazil and negotiated a deal in March to promote ethanol production in Latin America and the Caribbean.

U.S. companies and investors — including George Soros and agribusiness giants Archer Daniels Midland and Cargill — are staking out territory in Brazil, expecting even greater growth in biofuels.

Related Posts :
  1. An interview given by George Soros to the Finnish Broadcasting Company (YLE)
  2. George Soros: energy investments will fuel America’s next boom
  3. George Soros: End of Financial Crisis could be in Sight
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

An interview given by George Soros to the Finnish Broadcasting Company (YLE)

The material of the interview is similar with George Soros: energy investments will fuel America’s next boom and George Soros: End of Financial Crisis could be in Sight.


Related Posts :
  1. George Soros: energy investments will fuel America’s next boom
  2. George Soros: End of Financial Crisis could be in Sight
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

George Soros: energy investments will fuel America’s next boom

October 29, 2008. George Soros said energy investments will fuel America’s next boom.


George Soros on America's new engines of growth
Video courtesy of BigThinkCom


Related Posts :
  1. George Soros: End of Financial Crisis could be in Sight
  2. Soros slams market "fundamentalism"
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

George Soros: End of Financial Crisis could be in Sight

The script below is Nathan Gardels' interview with George Soros; the financier, philanthropist and author most recently of The New Paradigm for Financial Markets: The Credit Crisis of 2008 and What it Means. Mr. Soros spoke with Nathan Gardels in Washington, D.C., where the IMF and World Bank are meeting, on Sunday (October 12, 2008). One of the important points of his interview is developing alternative energy sources and building green infrastructure can be the new motor for the world economy:

Nathan Gardels:
    Let's talk first about the nature of the crisis. Thanks to low interest rates, global liquidity and deregulation, we have had a 25-year, self-reinforcing credit expansion bubble, leading to "irrational exuberance," as it was once said, in financial markets. Now we have the self-reinforcing crash of the stock and credit markets --"irrational despair" -- not justified by the economic fundamentals in the real economy.

    How does this pattern fit your theory of reflexivity and your new paradigm for understanding finance?

George Soros:
    The key to understanding this crisis -- the worst since the 1930s -- is to see that it was generated within the financial system itself. What we are witnessing is not the result of some exogenous shock that knocked things off balance, as the prevailing paradigm, which believes markets are self-correcting, would suggest. The reality is that financial markets are self-destabilizing; occasionally they tend toward disequilibrium, not equilibrium.

    The paradigm I'm proposing differs from the conventional wisdom in two respects. First, financial markets don't reflect the actual economic fundamentals. Expectations by traders and investors are always distorting them. Second, these distortions in the financial markets can affect the fundamentals -- as we see in both bubbles and crashes. Euphoria can lift housing and dot.com prices; panic can send sound banks tumbling.

    That two-way connection -- that you affect what you reflect -- is what I call "reflexivity." That is how financial markets really work. Their instability is now spreading to the real economy, not the other way around. In short, the boom-bust sequences, the bubbles, are endemic to the financial system.

    The current situation is not just about the housing bubble. The housing bubble was merely the trigger that detonated a much larger bubble. That super-bubble, created by the ever-increasing use of credit and debt leverage, combined with the conviction that markets are self-correcting, took more than 25 years to grow. Now it is exploding.

Gardels:
    What ought to be the "circuit breaker" that short-circuits the distortions that inevitably destabilize financial markets?

Soros:
    If bubbles are endemic in the system, then government regulators have to intervene to prevent bubbles from getting too big. Governments have to recognize that markets are not self-correcting. It is not enough to pick up the pieces after the crisis.

Gardels:
    Does the presence of the 24-hour global financial news cycle amplify and exaggerate distortions in the financial markets?

Soros:
    Without question, they accelerate the process. At the same time, I wouldn't overstate it. At the end of the 19th century, you didn't have 24-hour cable, but nevertheless you had the same kind of bubbles. Throughout the 19th century, when there was a laissez-faire mentality and insufficient regulation, you had one crisis after another. Each crisis brought about some reform. That is how central banking developed.

Gardels:
    How come all the efforts of the U.S. government so far -- the $700 billion rescue package, low Federal interest rates, backstopping deposits and commercial paper -- have not stemmed the crisis?

Soros:
    The U.S. authorities bought into market fundamentalist ideology. They thought that the markets would ultimately correct themselves. U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson epitomized this. He thought that six months after the Bear Stearns crisis the market would have adjusted and, "Well, if Lehman (Brothers) goes bust, the system can take it." Instead, everything fell apart.

    Since they did not understand the nature of the problem -- that the market would not correct itself -- they did not see the need for government intervention. They did not prepare a Plan B.

    As the shock of the Lehman failure set in, he had to change his mind and rescue AIG. The next day there was a run on the money markets and commercial paper markets, so he turned around again and said we need a $700 billion bailout. But he wanted to put the money in the wrong place -- taking the toxic securities out of the hands of the banks.

    They have finally now come around -- with the government buying equity in banks -- because they see the financial system is on the verge of collapse.

Gardels:
    Now that the U.S. authorities are at last on the right track, what are the key components of resolving the crisis?

Soros:
    The outlines are clear. There are five major elements.

    -- First, the government needs to recapitalize the banking system by buying equity stakes in banks.

    -- Second, interbank lending needs to be restarted with guarantees and bringing LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) in line with Fed funds. This is in the works. It is going to happen.

    -- Third, we must reform the mortgage system in the U.S., minimizing foreclosures and renegotiating loans so that mortgages are not worth more than houses. Stemming foreclosures will cushion the fall of housing prices.

    -- Fourth, Europe has to fix a weakness of the Euro by creating a safety net for its banks. While initially resisting this, they have now found religion and done it at their meeting in Paris on Sunday.

    -- Fifth, the IMF must deal with the vulnerability of countries at the periphery of the global financial system by providing a financial safety net. This is also in the works. The Japanese have already offered $200 billion for this purpose.

    These five steps will start the healing process. If we implement these measures effectively, we will have passed through the worst of the financial crisis.

    But then, I'm afraid, there is the fallout in the real economy, which is now gathering momentum. At this point, repairing the financial system will not stop a severe worldwide recession. Since, under this circumstance the U.S. consumer can no longer serve as the motor of the world economy, the U.S. government must stimulate demand. Because we face the menacing challenges of global warming and energy dependence, the next administration should direct any stimulus plan toward energy savings, developing alternative energy sources and building green infrastructure. This stimulus can be the new motor for the world economy.

Gardels:
    At the end of the day, won't we be looking at a vastly different global financial landscape? The U.S. will decline as the top power. It will have, along with parts of Europe, socialized banks and loads of debt. Communist China will be the new financial power globally, flush with capital and a major investor in the West.

Soros:
    U.S. influence will wane. It has already declined. For the past 25 years, we have been running a constant current account deficit. The Chinese and the oil-producing countries have been running a surplus. We have consumed more than we produced. While we have run up debt, they have acquired wealth with their savings. Increasingly, the Chinese will own a lot more of the world because they will be converting their dollar reserves and U.S. government bonds into real assets.

    That changes the power relations. The powershift toward Asia is a consequence of the sins of the last 25 years on the part of the United States.


Related Posts :
  1. Soros slams market "fundamentalism"
  2. George Soros: Global Capital Meltdown
  3. Soros : Paulson's Financial-Rescue Plan Is `Ill-Conceived'
  4. George Soros: Global Capital Meltdown
Sources :

Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

The World now needs about US $1 trillion bailout from IMF

From Bloomberg
Wednesday October 29, 2008

Gordon Brown, U.K. Prime Minister, on October 28, called on countries with large currency reserves such as China and oil-rich states to donate to the IMF.

The world probably will need more money because problems may spread from liquidity shortages to balance-of-payments gaps to slower economic growth, according to Strauss-Kahn, Managing Director of the IMF.

As Simon Johnson, a former IMF chief economist, said that The fund has the option to tap an additional $35 billion to $50 billion from rich countries. The IMF may need to go beyond that total to meet the demand for loans. He added, "If we are really facing the problem I think we are, you need about $1 trillion".

Demand for the fund's loans -- which had dried up over the past five years as developing nations boomed -- is now soaring. Hungary, Ukraine, Belarus, Iceland and Pakistan have all announced this month that they are seeking financial support from the IMF.

To qualify for the IMF's "Short-Term Liquidity Facility," countries must have been assessed by the IMF "very positively" on their recent economic policies, the fund said in a statement. Asked specifically about Argentina's eligibility, Strauss-Kahn said the country wouldn't qualify for the new program because it doesn't meet that standard.


Related Posts :
  1. East Europe Borrowers panic as Banks Cut Franc Loans
  2. Davidson Sees Threat to Dubai Economy From Credit
  3. Iceland's central bank unexpectedly raised the benchmark interest rate to 18 percent
  4. Hungary to get $25 bln rescue packages from IMF
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

Primary credit card limit of 25% consumers were reduced by banks

According to Standard & Poor's survey released Oct. 15, as much as 25% of they're at or near the limits on their primary credit card, and 20 % said they're approaching the limit on their secondary cards.

Purchasing may shrink further as more lenders follow Citigroup Inc. (see: Citigroup lost $1.4 billion from credit card securitization) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. and impose tougher lending standards to conserve capital. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. executives told analysts at a meeting this week that customers have "maxed out" their credit cards.

Outstanding credit-card debt has risen 75 percent since 1999, while real wages have grown 4 percent in the same period, according to a report last month by Innovest Strategic Value Advisors, headquartered in New York. These conditions are expected will cost retailers by losing as much as 8 % of their holiday sales this year which accounts for as much as 35 % of their annual revenue; because lenders and stores are clamping down on financing.

The less credit available to consumers has the more impacts into retailers confidence.

Related Posts :
  1. $915 bln in U.S. credit card debt is time bomb
  2. Citigroup lost $1.4 billion from credit card securitization
  3. The Next Meltdown: $950 bn Worth of Outstanding Credit-Card Debt—Much of it toxic
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

The bankruptcy of VeraSun was due to liquidity squeeze

The Front Range Energy ethanol plant with its giant corn silos
next to a cornfield in Windsor, Colorado July 7, 2006.
Reuters/Rick Wilking

VeraSun Energy Corp., one of the nation's largest ethanol producers announced late Friday that it is filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

The bankruptcy of VeraSun was due to tightening liquidity in the current credit market. Ethanol production has been spurred largely by the Federal Energy Policy Act since 2005. The package has created instant demand for ethanol, so the ethanol producers poured money to finance its expansion in the ethanol industries. But in recent months, ethanol prices have dropped along with oil prices. Meanwhile increasing demand of ethanol pushed up corn prices as raw material of US corn based ethanol production. As a result, that has cut into profit margins of ethanol production.

As corn prices increased but ethanol prices drop, that sent VeraSun and other ethanol producers into panic. In attempting to protect itself from rising corn prices, VeraSun locked in agreements to purchase corn at $6.75 to $7 a bushel in the future contracts. But then the prices on corn futures sank to $4 a bushel. In September, VeraSun said it had lost $63 million to $103 million due to bets on the prices of corn. VeraSun's current liabilities totaled $312 million at the end of the second quarter, and it had $1.4 billion in long-term debt. As the global credit crunch intensified in September, VeraSun was unable to secure the funding it needed to pay interest on its debt, which is due in December.


Related Posts :
  1. Dennis Gartman Predicts Corn Ethanol Producers Bankruptcy
  2. Bunge's Profit Fall - Fertilizer & Agriculture crash boom bang! (Update 1)
  3. Forget Oil, the New Bubble Burst is Agriculture
  4. Fertilizer Risks Increased by Higher Fuel Costs
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share