Translate this page from English into :

Monday, November 3, 2008

3 things that are going to happen after the downturn

From Contrarian Profits
By Ben Traynor
November 3, 2008

Let’s have a think about what’s going to happen after the downturn (it may seem hard to believe right now, but there will be an after the downturn). What will the world look like?

The answer will depend on what the jury decides in what is the most important trial of our times: Man versus Capitalism. The outlook for Capitalism isn’t good…

As Ambrose Evans-Pritchard writes in today’s Telegraph:

‘At this point I have given up hoping that we will draw the right conclusions from this crisis. The universal verdict is that capitalism has run amok.’

So what will the world look like after the guilty verdict is in? Let’s get ball rolling with three predictions about what the future global economy will look like:

1. The state will play a much larger role

This is pretty much nailed on already. Governments have already gone beyond being Lenders of Last Resort. Here in Britain, the government is buying into the banks directly.

It won’t stop there, either. Economies are shrinking and people are losing jobs. Governments will do whatever they can to minimise the damage, including giving people jobs directly. It would be political suicide not to.

2. Capital will be allocated less efficiently

For investors, this is the biggy. The prevailing “wisdom” has it that bankers are reckless mercenaries who throw money at ludicrously risky propositions in the hope of receiving a fat bonus before the whole thing blows up in their employer’s face.

While there may be an element of truth in that, let’s not get carried away. Banks exist to make money, and, by and large, it’s in their interests to lend where the return will be highest — while keeping risk to an acceptable level, of course. But that ‘acceptable level’ is now being redefined.

We will see tighter regulation of financial institutions. We could also see governments morph into reluctant banks managers as they attempt to keep the system on its feet. If this happens, expect lending decisions to be taking for political motives rather than profit motives. That is to say, the most profitable businesses — the ones that would deliver the most economic growth — will not necessarily be the ones that are funded.

Businesses that ten years ago would have had no problem getting a loan — and, crucially, that would have used that loan to fund profitable enterprises — will find it harder to get funds. As such, they will find it harder to grow, and shareholders will suffer.

To cut a long story short — the world of the future will be a harder place to make money.

3. Protectionism will end dollar hegemony

To be honest, there’s loads of culprits I could choose when I’m playing the Who Will Knife The Dollar game. But I’ve got this sneaking suspicion — call it a hunch — that protectionism will be the catalyst. Let me explain.

Whoever wins the US Presidential election, America is in big trouble. It will be hard to resist calls to whack up tariff barriers, and protect domestic jobs from foreign competition. A weakening dollar may help US exports a bit… but the US is in a bind.

If the dollar falls too much, foreign dollar holders (eg China and the oil-rich Gulf nations) will start dumping it. The US does well out of being the world’s reserve currency. Such a move would threaten that.

So what will the US do? It could pursue a strong dollar policy (I’m not sure how, but we’ll gloss over that here!). But that would hit exporters, and hit jobs. So, in response, some bright spark will start banging the drum for protectionism.

In desperation, the US government will reach for the lifeline. Foreigners who sell goods to Americans will suddenly find their access to the world’s biggest consumer market has been severely curtailed. Bad for them… but bad for America, too.

You see, those foreign dollar holders can see the currency’s fundamentals are weak. They’re sitting on all this money whose value is in the hands of a monetary authority (the Fed) and a government whose sole concern right now is fighting the downturn. The Fed has slashed rates, and there’s a strong chance the printing presses will soon go into overdrive.

So why are foreign dollar holders playing ball? Because, as things stand, it’s still in their interests to do so. Why would they want to antagonise a nation they do so much business with? Why would they impoverish their best customers?

But throw protectionism into the equation, and the incentives change. This is particularly true in the case of goods exporters like China. Overnight, the US market is less important to them.
Now, will this be enough to tip the balance? Will it reduce their incentive to co-operate enough so that they take their ball back and stop playing? Hard to say… but I think we’re going to find out.

One thing at a time… we need to get there first

Those are my three predictions for today. But many moons will pass through the night sky before this whole thing turns around. For now, we must do two things. We must prepare, and we must protect.


Related Posts :

Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

The Bull’s Case For Genentech

From iStockAnalyst
By Ryan Savitz

This article is part of a two-piece segment brought to you by Bullish Bankers. I will be presenting the bull case for the Genentech and Roche deal. Despite the recent credit turmoil, the Roche (RHHBY) and Genentech (DNA) deal has been in and out of the news since it was first announced on July 21st of this year, and many analysts point towards the deal progressing towards a higher bid from Roche. The original bid by Roche came in at $89.00 per share to acquire the remaining 44.1% that they do not already own for a total of $43.7 billion.

DNA’s management saw this as significantly undervaluing the company, and the Board rejected the bid in August. An August 13th press release quoting Dr. Charles A. Sanders, chairman of the special committee, said, “The special committee is confident in the company’s strong financial and clinical momentum and its uniquely productive R&D capabilities, which will continue to enhance shareholder value. In addition, we look forward to the company maintaining its successful relationship with Roche, regardless of ownership structure.”

This was further seen and proven by Genentech’s stock price trading up to approximately $99.00 days after the press release. I will provide 3 reasons why it would be beneficial for Roche to increase their bid.

1. DNAs Strong Pipeline

Genentech is strongly committed to expanding their pipeline as they remain a leader in the Biotechnology sub-sector. In 2007, DNA reinvested approximately 21% of its operating revenues into R&D, which was a significantly higher percentage than the industry average. Although you may think, “This must have a detrimental affect on their earnings?” The answer is simply no, because in order to show such significant high earning growth rates that the market anticipates, a company like DNA must push money into their pipeline. One thing to note with the deep pipeline is the multiple uses available for each specific drug.

Let’s break it down by phases:

  • Phase I: 21 drugs in Phase I with a total combined usage for 26 treatments (Oncology - 13 drugs, Neuroscience - 1 drug, Immunology - 6 drugs, and Tissue Growth & Repair - 1 drug). Although the succession rate is not severely high for drugs in Phase I, DNA continuously reinvests their revenue in order to deliver the most effective and efficient drugs to the market

  • Phase II: 12 drugs in Phase II with a total combined usage for 25 treatments (Oncology - 9 drugs and Immunology - 3 drugs). Avastin is waiting on 3 different uses in this Phase. We will highlight more on Avastin shortly

  • Phase III: 12 drugs in Phase III with a total combined usage for 34 treatments (Oncology - 7 drugs, Immunology - 3 drugs, and Tissue Growth & Repair - 2 drugs). Avastin has 16 treatments in this Phase

  • FDA Submission Prep: Avastin for relapsed glioblastoma multiforme and Xolair for pediatric asthma

  • Awaiting FDA Action: Avastin for first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma and Rituxan for rheumatoid arthritis DMARD-inadequate responders

Data as of October 14, 2008

As you can see with such a deep pipeline the amount of uses per drug is astounding. Although DNA does reinvest a hefty amount into expanding their pipeline, the trade-off has been, and will continue to be, quite attractive.

2. Avastin

By definition, Avastin is a recombinant humanized antibody to vascular endothelial growth vactor (VGEF) and is designed to bind to and inhibit VEGF, a protein that plays a critical role in tumor angiogenesis. Avastin is being studied worldwide in more than 450 clinical trials and in more than 30 different tumor types. The single drug contributed $2.3 billion in revenues during fiscal 2007 and is currently in a late stage study (3rd to date) for adjuvant colon cancer treatment. The best news DNA received recently came early last week on October 20th when a clinical study of Avastin along with chemotherapy in patients with early-stage bowel cancer is expected to continue as planned after independent experts backed its safety record. The final-stage Phase III study results, which involves some 2,710 patients, are expected in mid-2009. Analysts Karl-Heinz Koch said, “The timing of this announcement is somewhat surprising as the next interim analysis was not expected until the end of November and may have been requested by Genentech as part of its attempt to push up the takeover price for its remaining minority shareholders.” Avastin was responsible for 26.7% of product sales in 3rd Quarter of 2008 and some analysts project it accounting for 38.5% of product sales by 2012 (I feel this number may be somewhat conservative looking at all the potential treatments that are currently in trials).

Morgan Stanley predicts “the market will need to markedly increase the probability of success of Avastin in adjuvant breast cancer, a $5 billion potential market in the United States alone.

3. Great Relationship

For Roche, increasing a bid is pretty much a no-brainer. Having a majority stake in DNA has kept Roche as a leading provider of oncology treatment, and Genentech’s Oncology segment contributed 39.6% to Roche’s Pharma division in 2007. The partnership has lasted over 18 years and has been extremely beneficial for both sides. In 1990 Genentech and Roche Holding Ltd. of Basel, Switzerland completed the initial $2.1 billion merger. From that day on, they have worked collaboratively towards expanding upon the relationship and becoming the leader in multiple industries. With the deal going through, Roche will be able to penetrate the US markets more, and similarly, DNA will push forth with their blockbuster drugs into the international markets.

Conclusion

Of course financing is an obvious issue in this current market; however, analysts are pushing for a higher bid coming mid-2009 which I feel adamant about as well. Expect a bid coming in somewhere between $103-$110 range. The next few months will be quite exciting following Avastin news as well as the pending deal, so stay tuned for additional updates from Bullish Bankers.

Disclosure: The mutual fund that the author manages is long DNA.

Related Posts :

Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

Total bankruptcy filings until october'08

From Credit Slips

As yet another indicator of the tough economic times for American families, bankruptcy filings spiked in the month of October. According to the latest data from Automated Access to Court Electronic Records (AACER), there were 108,595 total bankruptcy petitions filed in the month of October for an average of 4,936 for each of the 22 business days during the month. October 2008 is the first time since the 2005 changes to the U.S. bankruptcy that there have been more than 100,000 bankruptcy filings in one month.

Of course, in the long-run, bankruptcy filing rates rise hand-in-hand with increases in credit availability. Over the short-term, however, bankruptcy filing rates as individuals find it more difficult to borrow to stave off the day of financial reckoning.

The average daily filing rate in October 2008 represents a 7.9% jump from the previous month and a 33.4% increase over the same month one year before.

Related Posts :

Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

Potash Corp. (POT) Remains on Top

Barron's Naureen Malik talks about the resilience of Potash Corporation, as it looks compelling, giving that long-term fundamentals haven't changed. (Oct. 31)



Related Posts :
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

More Downside Ahead for Solar

The 4MW Solar Power Plant in Dimbach, Germany, utilizing
First Solar thin film photovoltaic modules, is seen
in this undated handout photo.
REUTERS/Blitzstrom/Beck Energy/Handout

From SeekingAlpha
By Eric Savitz
About stocks: CSIQ, STP
November 03, 2008

While solar stocks have plunged 60% over the last three months, there could be more downside ahead, Barclay’s solar analyst Vishal Shah warned this morning.

In a series of research notes, Shah cautions that the solar sector financial reports for the remainder of the third quarter reporting period “could turn out to be disappointing as concerns over potential inventory build triggered by [the] credit environment and FX headwinds prompt companies to maintain a cautious outlook on Q4 and [first half 2009] earnings.”

Shah notes that the solar companies he follows generate more than 90% of revenue from Europe. He says that for some companies selling into the European market in Euros and purchasing supplies in Chinese renminbi, gross margins could drop from over 20% in the first half of 2008 to well below 10% over the next several quarters. Shah also sees increasing risks of channel inventory build in Europe “as the credit markets outside of Germany completely frozen and even within Germany, large projects above 4 MW are likely to face greater difficulty in securing financing.”

Shah expect spot market prices for polysilicon, wafers and modules all to come under “significant pressure over the next few quarters.”

In Shah’s view, demand for solar panels will decline sequentially in both Q4 of this year and Q1 of next year, while supply is likely to rise 10-15% in each quarter. To avoid inventory build, he says module supply reductions would required of 20% in Q4 and 60% in Q1.

Shah says the 60% drop in in solar stocks has discounted some but not all fundamentals concerns; he sees further downside ahead. “Shares may not bottom until excess inventory has been worked through the channel,” he writes.

Shah today cut his ratings on both Suntech (STP) and Canadian Solar (CSIQ) to Underweight from Equal Weight. For STP, he chops his Q4 EPS estimate to 28 cents from 45 cents; for ‘09, he now sees $1.15, down from $2.35. His price target goes to - brace yourself, STP bulls - $11 from $60. Likewise, for CSIQ, his Q4 estimate is now 38 cents, down from 56 cents, while his 2009 estimate is reduced to $1 from $2.85. His price target for CSIQ is now $8, down from $18.50.

Despite the bearish call, both STP and CSIQ are trading higher this morning: STP is up $1.50, or 8.6%, to $19, while CSIQ is up $1.20 , or 12.4%, to $10.88.

Related Posts :
  1. Energy Funds and Stocks Will Move in the Opposite Direction Against Swinging Oil Prices
  2. Solar Bubble Burst !!!
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

GS & MS’s Q4 2008 earning estimates

According to Merrill Lynch analyst Guy Moszkowski, Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS) will likely post a fourth-quarter loss, its first ever as a public company, due to the "stressed" equity environment over the past two months, which will also weigh on Morgan Stanley's (MS) quarterly results.

However Morgan Stanley should be in a relatively better position than Goldman because of its business mix -- limited private equity and very little proprietary equity trading at this point.

GS remains in many ways at the forefront of the capital markets industry, but if it can't consistently produce a premium return on equity (ROE), it's not going to be able to continue to have the premium valuation multiple that it has enjoyed.
The analyst now expects Goldman to post a fourth-quarter loss of 49 cents per share, compared with his prior profit view of $2.98 per share. He also lowered his price target on the stock to $100 from $159 to reflect the fourth-quarter loss estimate and uncertainty on 2009 ROE.

Moszkowski said, “With this 4Q loss, GS would have underperformed MS for 2 straight quarters in terms of ROE, and our forecast for2009 is for ROE of around 10 percent”.
He cut Morgan Stanley's fourth-quarter earnings estimate to 36 cents a share from 72 cents, mainly reflecting the expectation of another significant leveraged finance mark of $1.4 billion as spreads widened significantly in the quarter.

Moszkowski continues to rate Goldman a "neutral," and Morgan Stanley a "buy".


Related Posts :

Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

Apple Slashes iPhone Production


From Silicon Alley Insider
November 3, 2008 10:30 AM


Is demand slowing for Apple's (AAPL) red-hot iPhone 3G?

Apple has cut its Q4 iPhone production plans significantly more than originally estimated, according to Friedman Billings Ramsey analyst Craig Berger. Instead of a 10% sequential production drop in Q4, Berger's "recent checks" suggest Apple's iPhone production could fall "more than 40%" from its Q3 levels. Berger thinks a similar cut was made for Q1, but notes that there's still plenty of time to change that.

What does this mean? A significant production cut isn't necessarily a direct reflection of significantly slowing iPhone demand. And it's possible that Apple's Q3 production was higher than normal on purpose. But it's certainly not good news. Further, Berger notes that the iPhone cuts are "a negative global demand" signal:
    That the firm's iPhone production plans are being revised lower suggests that the global macroecomomic weakness is impacting even high-end consumers, those that are more likely to buy Apple's expensive gadgets, and that no market segment will be spared in this global downturn. This is a negative signal for global demand, in our view.
Apple shipped 6.9 million iPhones in its September quarter, but that included 2 million iPhones in channel inventory in 30,000 distribution points.

Related Posts :
  1. Mobile Video Market Still Growing
  2. Internet Market Share by Operating System per October 2008
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

11/03/08-Fitch: US Credit Card Losses May Hit Historic Levels In 2009

Monday, November 03, 2008

Fitch Ratings said Monday that U.S. credit card portfolio losses will increase in the year ahead, with measures of credit continuing to deteriorate into 2009, and with some issuers surpassing historical loss peaks before 2009 is over. "A turn in the cycle will be heavily dependent upon the duration of an economic downturn and the severity of the increase in the unemployment rate," it said. It cited rising job losses, volatile energy prices and the absence of refinancing options such as low-rate balance transfers and home equity loans.

Copyright © 2008 MarketWatch, Inc.

Related Posts :
  1. Primary credit card limit of 25% consumers were reduced by banks
  2. $915 bln in U.S. credit card debt is time bomb
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

Enthusiasm for the uranium producers is back

By Barry Sergeant
November 3, 2008 15:05

Global investor portfolio flows show an especial appetite for uranium names, from established producers like ERA, to stocks which had all but wiped out, like Xemplar. Tables included.

Listed uranium stocks may have surrendered some $31bn in market value since the price of uranium oxide - "yellow cake" peaked out in June 2007, but very recent investor portfolio flows indicate a resurgent interest in the sector. Not only have prices for uranium oxide fallen continuously from $136/lb in June 2007, to current levels around $45/lb, but like all listed stocks, and in particular mining stocks, uranium names have been singled out for special punishment.

Analysis of listed uranium names indicates that enthusiasm for the sector is back. Stock prices for uranium developers, or juniors, are now on average 51% above low points, and for listed producers of uranium oxide, 46% higher than recorded lows.

In value terms, the aggregate gains amount to $4bn in market value, driven by heavily capitalised stocks such as Cameco, the world's leading producer, ERA, the listed uranium producer inside the Rio Tinto stable, now 63% above its low stock price, and Uranium One, which has risen recently on news that it has placed its cash burning Dominion mine in South Africa on care-and-maintenance.

Investors appear unperturbed by further recent confirmation that BHP Billiton, owner and operator of Olympic Dam, by far the world's biggest uranium deposit, is to expand the Australian mine, which also ranks as the fourth largest copper deposit in the world, and the world's fourth largest gold deposit. Beyond Olympic Dam, the majority of the world's biggest uranium oxide deposits are either expanding or yet to come into production.



World's biggest uranium deposits

Olympic DamBHP BillitonExpanding
Elkonsky GorskRosnedraProduction 2010
ImourarenArevaProduction 2011
McArthur RiverCamecoIn production
InkaiCamecoProduction 2010
VikenCPMDeveloping

Cigar Lake
CamecoIn production
Streltsovskoye

TVEL

In production
JabilukaERAMay produce
MynkudukKazAtomPromExpanding


Investors have recently shown a stronger appetite for uranium developers, explorers and juniors, as seen in the cases of Alliance Resources, Bannerman, Forsys (set to produce), Extract Resources, UR-Energy, Hathor Exploration, Kalahari Minerals, and even stocks that had all but declined by 100% in market value, such as Xemplar Energy
Selected uranium stocks
ProducersFromFromValue
pricehigh*low*USD bn
CamecoCAD 19.73-57.6%37.7%5.667
ERAAUD 15.25-38.9%63.1%1.975
PaladinAUD 2.60-72.2%59.5%1.084
Uranium OneCAD 1.02-90.5%70.0%0.398
DenisonCAD 1.53-88.0%28.6%0.242
Producer averages/total
-69.4%51.8%9.367
Weighted averages-64.9%45.7%

Developers & other
First UraniumCAD 1.40-88.3%37.3%0.153
UEXCAD 0.80-91.4%50.9%0.122
Uranium Part.CAD 6.21-54.2%38.0%0.374
Summit ResourcesAUD 1.85-47.7%23.3%0.264
Mega UraniumCAD 0.85-85.1%25.0%0.133
Alliance ResourcesAUD 0.64-67.1%124.6%0.119
BannermanAUD 0.36-91.4%57.8%0.036
ForsysCAD 5.26-15.0%163.0%0.338
Aurora EnergyCAD 1.30-92.3%56.6%0.079
LaramideCAD 1.22-86.2%60.5%0.064
Mantra ResourcesAUD 0.70-82.5%16.7%0.038
Energy MetalsAUD 0.38-75.5%0.0%0.030
Deep YellowAUD 0.15
-69.8%
38.1%0.110
Extract ResourcesAUD 0.99-33.4%79.1%0.142
Strateco ResourcesCAD 0.58-83.2%45.0%0.056
Strathmore MineralsCAD 0.29-92.2%81.3%0.018
UR-EnergyCAD 0.64-85.2%88.2%0.050
Thor Mining
AUD 0.03-89.1%20.0%0.003
Uranium ResourcesUSD 0.94-93.7%36.2%0.052
UranerzCAD 0.75-83.0%0.0%0.035
Hathor ExplorationCAD 1.80-59.1%295.6%0.123
Mineral SecuritiesGBP 0.29-61.1%1.8%0.077

Marathon Resources
AUD 0.44-86.1%
112.2%0.018
Nufcor UraniumGBP 0.92-76.2%22.7%0.062
Kalahari MineralsGBP 0.38-19.4%78.6%0.102
Pan African
GBP 0.03-71.8%0.0%0.049
Uranium EnergyUSD 0.46-90.5%4.5%0.021
West Aust. MetalsAUD 0.08-81.8%56.9%0.018
Tournigan
CAD 0.19-92.8%31.0%0.019
Scimitar ResourcesAUD 0.13-84.2%13.6%0.004
Vital MetalsAUD 0.09-91.1%13.3%0.006
Southern UraniumAUD 0.04-86.8%
19.4%
0.003
Uranium EquitiesAUD 0.08-75.0%7.1%0.010
Black Range MineralsAUD 0.02-89.1%28.6%0.007
Berkeley ResourcesGBP 0.10-86.8%5.3%0.017
Xemplar EnergyCAD 0.26-96.9%116.7%0.026
JNR Resources
CAD 0.34-90.3%119.4%0.023
Crosshair ExplorationCAD 0.13-95.5%30.0%0.010
A-CAP ResourcesAUD 0.15-84.5%
15.4%0.011
Fission EnergyCAD 0.15-90.9%76.5%0.005
Curnamona EnergyAUD 0.19-84.8%22.6%0.009
Coronation MineralsCAD 0.04-90.9%33.3%0.003
Khan ResourcesCAD 0.24-92.5%30.6%0.011
Bayswater UraniumCAD 0.08-93.8%14.3%0.010
Energy Fuels
CAD 0.22-91.1%33.3%0.012
Azimut ExplorationCAD 0.44-91.5%17.6%0.006
Desert EnergyAUD 0.11-73.1%75.0%0.006
Pancontinental UraniumCAD 0.12-89.9%50.0%0.005
Pepinnini MineralsAUD 0.28-79.3%40.0%0.013
Nuinsco ResourcesCAD 0.08-77.8%77.8%0.012
West ProspectorCAD 0.16-92.7%39.1%0.007
Pitchstone ExplorationCAD 0.20-93.9%39.3%0.005
Canalaska UraniumCAD 0.08-86.7%33.3%0.009
Uranium PowerCAD 0.12-85.4%15.0%0.009
Bitterroot ResourcesCAD 0.13-88.0%30.0%0.006
Encounter ResourcesAUD 0.10-81.0%38.6%0.005
Calypso UraniumCAD 0.06-92.2%71.4%0.003
Magnum UraniumCAD 0.15-84.5%25.0%0.004
Atomic ResourcesAUD 0.10-67.7%25.0%0.004
Titan Uranium
CAD 0.17-88.5%41.7%0.007
UranexAUD 0.14-90.1%27.3%0.008
Red Hill EnergyCAD 0.25-79.5%8.7%0.010
Pele MountainCAD 0.14-78.1%133.3%0.010
Crossland UraniumAUD 0.08-71.4%23.1%0.006
Monaro Mining
AUD 0.13-87.9%30.0%0.008
Epsilon EnergyAUD 0.09-89.7%12.5%0.003
Eromanga UraniumAUD 0.05-82.0%60.7%0.004
African EnergyAUD 0.02-95.9%0.0%0.002
Fusion ResourcesAUD 0.30
-77.3%
42.9%0.010
NWT UraniumCAD 0.03-96.4%50.0%0.003
Cash MineralsCAD 0.04-95.1%16.7%0.003
Apollo MineralsAUD 0.24-55.7%46.9%0.015
Forum UraniumCAD 0.06-90.3%100.0%0.004
Wealth MineralsCAD 0.29-91.3%72.7%0.006
Santoy ResourcesCAD 0.09-89.2%70.0%0.007
Uracan ResourcesCAD 0.20-79.6%48.1%0.011
Niger UraniumGBP 0.08-80.5%0.0%0.014
Unor
CAD 0.05-84.6%100.0%0.006
Purepoint UraniumCAD 0.05-91.9%25.0%0.003
Nortec VenturesCAD 0.12-67.1%35.3%0.007
Int'l EnexcoCAD 0.23-92.8%15.0%0.004
U3O8 Corp.CAD 0.30-84.2%76.5%0.006
Silver SpruceCAD 0.11-90.1%37.5%0.004
Triex MineralsCAD 0.28-92.8%66.7%0.005
Rum Jungle UraniumAUD 0.08-72.4%4.1%0.006
Solex ResourcesCAD 0.09-85.1%70.0%0.004
Uravan MineralsCAD 0.24-73.3%118.2%0.005
Universal UraniumCAD 0.05-92.9%42.9%0.002
Oklo UraniumAUD 0.04-83.7%0.0%0.002
Hawk UraniumCAD 0.04-92.2%40.0%0.002
Macusani YellowcakeCAD 0.20
-82.9%
100.0%0.004
Great AustralianAUD 0.04-90.3%0.0%0.003
Contact UraniumAUD 0.05-91.7%25.0%0.004
Blue Sky UraniumCAD 0.05-92.1%42.9%0.001
Aura EnergyAUD 0.25-51.9%127.3%0.007
Empire ResourcesAUD 0.05-80.8%25.0%0.002
Northern ContinentalCAD 0.12-72.1%71.4%0.005
Int'l MontoroCAD 0.08-81.3%114.3%0.001
North Atlantic ResourcesCAD 0.09-85.8%6.3%0.002
Uranium CityCAD 0.02-95.5%0.0%0.001
Developer averages/total
-82.0%47.3%3.184
Weighted averages -81.1%50.8%
Overall averages/total-80.6%47.1%12.551
Overall weighted averages -71.2%46.9%
Diversifieds with uranium
ArevaEUR 399.99-51.2%19.9%18.153
Rio TintoGBP 28.70-60.0%46.6%67.444
BHP BillitonGBP 10.56-52.1%39.6%106.110
AngloGold AshantiUSD 18.25-62.8%31.1%6.400
EquinoxCAD 1.07-84.7%40.8%0.529
* 12-month


Related Posts :

Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

11/03/08-J.P. Morgan upgraded Wal-Mart

Monday, November 03, 2008

Wal-Mart Stores was upgraded to overweight from neutral by J.P. Morgan, which said there's a "respectable entry point." It said Wal-Mart's consumer image is truning more favorable, the margin drains from international are subsiding and management is revising its capital allocations.

Copyright © 2008 MarketWatch, Inc.

Related Posts :
  1. 11/03/08-Goldman Sachs downgraded Boeing
  2. 11/3/08-Baidu.com plans to buyback
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

11/03/08-Goldman Sachs downgraded Boeing

Monday, November 03, 2008

Boeing was downgraded to conviction sell from neutral by Goldman Sachs, saying investors should sell into the strength from the resolution of the machinists union strike. "Aerospace companies have yet to capitulate to current market conditions implying downside to company guidance and consensus estimates," the broker said.

Copyright © 2008 MarketWatch, Inc.

Related Posts :
  1. 11/3/08-Baidu.com plans to buyback
  2. 11/3/08-Goldman Sach: Schlumberger Upgraded, Halliburton Downgraded
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

11/3/08-Baidu.com plans to buyback

Monday, November 03, 2008

Baidu.com Inc. said Monday it plans to repurchase up to $200 million worth of its own American Depositary Shares by the end of 2009.

Copyright © 2008 MarketWatch, Inc.

Related Posts :
  1. 11/3/08-Goldman Sach: Schlumberger Upgraded, Halliburton Downgraded
  2. S&P Cuts Las Vegas Sands To 'B'
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

11/3/08-Goldman Sach: Schlumberger Upgraded, Halliburton Downgraded

Monday, November 03, 2008

Schlumberger drew an upgrade to buy from neutral at Goldman Sachs on Monday. Analyst Charles Minervino added the oil service giant to his conviction buy list based on its international opportunities. Schlumberger's overseas business "positions it better in this environment as North American spending cuts have trended worse than we expected," Minervino said in a note to clients on Monday. Goldman also downgraded Halliburton to neutral from buy, "given its high exposure to cyclically sensitive product lines like pressure pumping which is not where we want to be positioned heading into this downcycle." Goldman Sachs downgraded Diamond Offshore to neutral from buy and removed Transocean from its conviction buy list.

Copyright © 2008 MarketWatch, Inc

Related Posts :
  1. S&P Cuts Las Vegas Sands To 'B'
  2. Fitch cut rating of Hartford Financial Services Group
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

Is Commercial Real Estate the Next?

Visitors walk past a LandAmerica Financial Group booth at
the Mortgage Bankers' Association convention in San Francisco,
California October 21, 2008. The company facilitates the purchase,
sale, transfer, and financing of residential and commercial real estate.
REUTERS/Robert Galbraith (UNITED STATES)

By Jim Randel
November 3, 2008 06:37 AM (EST)

Some journalists have been suggesting that values in commercial real estate will be the next to crash - following housing and dragging the U.S. economy even further into a serious funk.

Prior to giving you my opinion, I'd like to give you my resume: before I turned to journalism (writing, teaching and speaking), I spent 30 years as a real estate investor. During that period I bought and sold single-family houses, small multi-unit properties (duplexes and triplexes), apartment buildings, office and retail properties, factories, warehouses and land. In addition, I built condominiums during the stagflation of Jimmy Carter's Presidency (prime rate of about 20%) and struggled through the real estate crash (both banks and S&L's) in the late eighties and early nineties. So, I feel that I should know what is coming next.

Actually, however, I don't. But, I can give you the factors that will affect what happens:

  1. Financing
    if lenders get overcautious - which of course is already happening - problems in commercial real estate will become self-fulfilling. In other words, if enough lenders considering a refinance or new loan say to themselves "I am worried about commercial real estate prices, therefore I will pass on this loan or, impose some serious restrictions," well that statement will be a self-fulfilling prophecy. As everyone knows, the grease of the real estate world - be it housing or commercial real estate - is debt. If the free-flow of debt starts to clog up, prices will fall (correct that: since they are already falling, they will fall further).

    As an aside, I think real estate lenders have got to act as if real estate investors are the goose that has laid them a golden egg for many years. I am OK with caution but when lenders start going overboard (as they always do), they can kill their fine goose (and themselves in the process).

  2. The Economy
    needless to say, the fundamentals of commercial real estate require that businesses rent space. The retail world is already in trouble and owners of retail properties are feeling it. Some commentators have suggested that commercial real estate is buffered from economic problems because of lease agreements, i.e. five and ten-year contracts committing to a space. Unfortunately, that is only the case when the tenant is a significant credit. When retail sales soften, the 80% or so of non-national tenants (sometimes called "mom and pop" stores) start calling their landlords seeking immediate rent reductions "to keep afloat." I have already gotten these calls from retail tenants.

    As to the health of office properties, that too depends upon how quickly the economy pulls out of the nose dive it is in. While retail tenants may bear the brunt of consumer cutbacks sooner than office tenants, obviously an economic tsunami that is 2/3 dependent upon consumer spending brings down all sorts of boats. There will be some office-user defaults but probably more problematic is office users putting sublease space on the market (as the result of lay-off's) which spikes vacancy rates and drives down rentals.

  3. The Pricing Model
    one topic that I have spoken about for many years is the subjectivity of the housing pricing model. In other words, a house is only worth what people think it is worth. Only in rare cases (such as investors buying foreclosed houses) do people buy a house based on a net income analysis. 99% of home buying decisions are emotional and because of that, in a free fall like we have now, there is no real floor. Prices will only recover when home buyers across the board (not just investors) think that prices have stopped falling. In other words, it is all about buyer psychology.

    To be distinguished is commercial real estate. There is little psychology involved when an investor buys an investment property. It is all about the rent and expenses. Every investor asks himself: what is the net present value of the income stream I can expect from this property over the next five years or so? That is really all that matters. For that reason, commercial real estate investors are not subject to extreme swings in the psychology of the market. If rents hold up, then they will react rationally and work their properties. Few will panic because the media starts speaking about deflation or depression.

  4. Owner Behavior
    one cause of the housing crisis is that homeowners who are walking from their properties are making rational decisions when they are "under water," i.e. they have more debt than value. Since residential lenders almost never chase a home owner for his or her deficiency (the shortfall on the face amount of the debt when a house is sold by foreclosure), homeowners have little economic incentive (other than maintaining credit scores) to stay with a house whose values have dropped.

The situation with commercial real estate owners is different for several reasons:
  • As already mentioned, the commercial real estate owner is a pure numbers guy or gal. If rents are holding, he or she will fight the fight to hold ownership as long as possible. Back in the days of the "S & L" crisis, the mantra of me and my buddies in the early nineties was "just stay alive 'til '95." In other words, most of us believed that the real estate world would eventually right itself and most of us were psychologically prepared to hold on until that happened.

  • Commercial real estate lenders, unlike residential lenders, have every intention of chasing defaulting borrowers when the lender has recourse protection, i.e. personal signatures or guarantees on a loan. No commercial real estate owner with recourse debt just up and walks.

  • Commercial real estate owners, in general, have a greater margin for error than do many homeowners. When nutty lenders put U.S. homeowners into 95%+ loan-to-value mortgages in the first seven years of this decade, they created a situation with no room for error. Although some commercial owners do have too much debt, most owners have significant equity in their property as well as reserves against downturns. The fact is that any real estate investor whose ability to pay his debt depends on a couple of months of cash flow from his property is probably a newbie to the business. Those who have lived through real estate cycles before - most real estate investors - realize that real estate ownership can be a roller coaster ride. And they prepare for the ride by skipping lunch at times (is this metaphor making you sick to your stomach?).

In conclusion, anything can happen of course but I do not see large-scale defaults in the commercial real estate world approximating anything even close to the housing world - unless, of course, the economy continues to struggle for the next few years. If that happens, then all bets are off!!

Jim Randel is the author of Confessions of a Real Estate Entrepreneur (McGraw Hill, 2006) and the just-released The Skinny on the Housing Crisis (Clover Leaf, 2008).
www.jimrandel.com


Related Posts :
  1. Office Vacancy Rate Rises Sharply
  2. Commercial Real Estate Loans May Be Next Shoe to Drop
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share

Bottom in Won, Rupiah and Rupee

A woman looks at an electronic currency board at a money changer
in Jakarta October 24, 2008. Indonesia's central bank will always be
in the market to support the rupiah, Bank Indonesia Governor Boediono said
on Friday, as the currency weakened to its lowest level
in nearly three years. REUTERS/Enny Nuraheni (INDONESIA)

According to Hiroshi Morikawa - senior strategist in Tokyo at MU Investments Co, The Asian financial system is on a stronger footing. That's why Asia's currencies have the potential to outperform.

The biggest rout in Asian currencies since the crisis in 1997 is tempting investors to buy in the region that still enjoys the world's fastest economic growth and $4 trillion of reserves. While stocks and foreign exchange rates in emerging markets tumbled since the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in September, Templeton, Sydbank and Mirae Asset Global Investments Ltd. said Asian economies are safer because banks and governments spent a decade amassing reserves, laying the foundation for sustained growth.

Franklin Templeton Investments, which manages about $500 billion, favors the Malaysian ringgit and China's yuan. While Sydbank A/S, Denmark's third-largest bank, is buying South Korean won, Indonesian rupiah and Indian rupee. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said last week that the won may gain 10 percent the next six months.

The differential in growth between Asia and other regions should continue to attract capital, and growth may further benefit from initiatives of local governments that have significant resources to bolster domestic demand. A longer-term picture, Asian currencies should perform better.

China, India and Southeast Asia's five other largest economies will grow 8.4 percent this year and 7.7 percent in 2009, according to the International Monetary Fund in Washington. The growth is very higher if it’s compared to US’ GDP which will expand 0.1 percent next year. While the forecast for the 15 European nations sharing the euro is only 0.2 percent.


Related Posts :
  1. Indonesian Banks Better Prepared
  2. Sir John Templeton's 16 Rules of Investment Success
Sources :Please Note!

This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer on the bottom for more information.

You are welcome to republish this article, or any portion thereof.
Please, cite the actual/original source. I would be grateful if you could link back.


Stumble Upon Toolbar Add to Technorati Favorites Bookmark and Share